Ethical bases in scientific Research and its disclosure
Palabras clave:
scientific popularization, research ethics, scientific investigationSinopsis
Scientific work, technology and innovation and their dissemination constitute an inevitable part throughout human history, but at present, it has particular characteristics, due to the boom in our communication media of our time. Daily we use products derived from scientific praxis and its technological manufacture, as well as we consume the information related to it in books, scientific articles, papers, documentaries, radio programs, multimedia, etc., enormous information that requires reflective discernment on the part of the receiver, but mainly from the person who prepares the communication and disseminates it, from the scientific disseminator.
Both the producer of science, technology and innovation and their communications, as well as the disseminator and the consumer of the same, converge in the personal reality and the shared social context, hence it is necessary to reflect it as human activities where rationality is inevitably present , volition, the exercise of freedom, intentionality, among other realities, all of them subject to ethical understanding and experience.
The present text entitled has been prepared thought to be a writing with clarifying content of the philosophical notions involved in ethics aimed at people interested in scientific research and its dissemination, who come formatively from various areas and disciplines of human knowledge: professionals of the health, professionals of the experimental sciences, experts in technology and social communications, as well as educators of various levels and modalities, all interested in scientific work and its dissemination, in such a way that the text presented, in its preparation, has followed the recommendation of Ortega y Gasset: "clarity is the courtesy of the philosopher", and of course it is also the courtesy of any researcher of the different sciences and disciplines of knowledge.
The book is the product of an applied conceptual analysis investigation that seeks to fill a void regarding the ethics of research, particularly its disclosure, in which information is often biased and ideologized, and even invented with no other intention than to capture advertising with exclusive economic interests that depersonalize the scientist and the disseminator, turning science into a manipulable object of the market, so it is projected to motivate reflection and comprehensive training in humanistic competencies of those interested in these issues.
The methodological dynamics of the team that authored this work, led by Francisco Reluz, occurred in the first place by the design of a proposal for the dissemination of ethical reflections in research that seeks to be more reflective than informative, based on the expertise of each of the summoned authors, so that after a careful study, socialize the whole team in order to jointly analyze what was expressed and, in a second phase, collect the contributions made in the analysis and comments of the team, so that the final text , which you now have in your hands, dear reader, meet the requirements for clarifying information and reflective motivation on the need for ethics in research and its dissemination, hence the presentation of a casuistry that complements the text.
Based on what has been said, in the first part Wilder Chanduví reflects on the ethical bases of science and its dissemination, while Francisco Reluz addresses the issue of the person and their action in scientific dissemination in addition to reflecting on the principles, values and normative establishing their relationship with science and its dissemination, while Mirtha Cervera, Abel Ballena and Juan Moyano carry out a careful selection of cases for analysis and pose crucial questions that guide reflection, in such a way that readers can investigate and resolve by consolidating critical thinking.
The authors
Citas
Alonso, F & Cortiñas, S. (2014). La pseudociencia y el poder de los medios de comunicación. La problemática ausencia de bases teóricas para afrontar el fenómeno. Historia y Comunicación Social, 19 (3), 93-103. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HICS/article/view/45111/42480
Asociación Médica Mundial (2017). Declaración de Helsinki. Principios Éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/
Bernal, A., Gonzálvez, V & Burguet, M. (2017). Construcción ética de la ciudadanía en la actualidad. Universidad de Murcia.
Asociación Británica de Investigación Educativa- BERA. (2019). Guía Ética para la Investigación Educativa (4a.ed.) (L. Rivera & R. Casado-Muñoz, Trads.). https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/guia-etica-para-la-investigacion-educativa.
Broncano, F. (2019). Los fracasos de la inteligencia artificial: por qué es necesario replantearla. El Confidencial. https://blogs.elconfidencial.com/tecnologia/tribuna/2019-10-05/inteligencia-artificial-digitaizacion-inteligencia-humana_2269863/
Cyranoski D. (2019). The CRISPR-baby scandal: what's next for human gene-editing. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00673-1
Cyranoski D. (2020). What CRISPR-baby prison sentences mean for research. Nature. https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-019-00673-1/d41586-019-00673-1.pdf.
Díaz, G.M. (2016). El fraude en las publicaciones científicas: más allá de fabricar, falsificar y plagiar. Tecno Lógicas, 19(36), 09-12. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-77992016000100001
Escobar-Ortiz, J.M. y Rincón-Álvarez, A. (2018). La divulgación científica y sus modelos comunicativos: algunas reflexiones teóricas para la enseñanza de las ciencias. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales, (10)1, 135-154. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6992427
Elgegren, F. (2010). La Antropología filosófica. Búsqueda de la comprensión de la persona en sus dimensiones. En AA VV. Dimensiones de la Persona (pp. 13-49). UNIFE.
Europa Press (2019, agosto 9) Descubierta por casualidad una nueva especie de dinosaurio en Sudáfrica. https://www.elperiodico.com/es/sociedad/20190809/descubierta-casualidad-nueva-especie-dinosaurio-7588540
Frondizi, R. (2016). ¿Qué son los valores? Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Gadea, W Cuenca, R Chaves Montero, A. (2019). Epistemología y Fundamentos de la Investigación Científica. Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja.
González, V. (2019, octubre 25). Los mayores fraudes científicos de la historia. Muy Interesante. https://www.muyinteresante.es/ciencia/fotos/los-mayores-fraudes-cientificos-de-la-historia/1
González, C. (2016, marzo 30). Así ha sido el fiasco de Tay, la inteligencia artificial racista y misógina de Microsoft. El País Economía. https://cincodias.elpais.com/cincodias/2016/03/30/lifestyle/1459328309_661666.html
Greely H.T. (2018). CRISPR People the Science and Ethics of Editing Humans. MIT Press
Informe Belmont (1978). Principios Éticos y Directrices para la Protección de sujetos humanos de investigación. Comisión Nacional para la Protección de Sujetos Humanos de Investigación Biomédica y de Comportamiento-EUA.
Jiankui, H. (2018, noviembre 25). About Lulu and Nana: Twin Girls Born Healthy After Gene Surgery As Single-Cell Embryos. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/th0vnOmFltc.
Jaramillo, J (2020). Historia y Filosofía de la medicina. Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica.
Jonas, H. (1995). El principio de responsabilidad. Ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica. Herder.
Lorente, J.I. (2015). Información de actualidad, divulgación científica y discurso del riesgo. Revista Científica Amnis. https://doi.org/10.4000/amnis.2489
Luengo, E. (2018). Las vertientes de la complejidad. ITESO Universidad Jesuita de Guadalajara.
Lusa, L. (2018, noviembre 26). Universidade abre investigação ao cientista que diz ter criado bebés manipulados genéticamente. https://www.publico.pt/2018/11/26/ciencia/noticia/cientista-chines-criado-bebes-manipulados-geneticamente-mundo-1852465.
Marchione M. (2018, noviembre 26). Chinese researcher claims first gene-edited babies. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/ap-top-news-international-news-ca-state-wire-genetic-frontiers-health-4997bb7aa36c45449b488e19ac83e86d
Marcos, A. (2010). Filosofía de la naturaleza humana. École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
Martínez Gutiérrez, B. (2016). Apuntes de Filosofía. Editorial Digital Imprenta Nacional.
Mattéi, J.F. (2009). L’humain et la personne, sous la direction de François-Xavier Putallaz et Bernard N. Schumacher. Ed. Cert.
Monbiot, G. (2018, setiembre 16). La estafa de las revistas científicas se acerca a su fin. El Diario. https://www.eldiario.es/internacional/theguardian/estafa-revistas-cientificas-acerca-fin_129_1942918.html
Morín, E. (2006). El método: Ética. Editorial Cátedra
O´neil, O. (2002). Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
Peterson, C. & Seligman, M. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification. Oxford University Press.
Ratzinger, J. (2003). Verdad, valores y poder. Ed. Rialp
Reluz, F.F, Cervera, M.F, Taboada, L.A (2020). Persona y formación universitaria. Grupo Editorial Expresión.
Reluz, F.F. (2017). Valores y moralidad en la formación médica. Una experiencia en investigación. EAE
Scaliter, J. (2020, setiembre 21). La otra vida de Pi: el transporte del 2025. Revista virtual N+1. https://nmas1.org/material/2020/09/21/futuro-transporte-pi
Chinese scientist 'proud' of gene-editing trial despite international outcry (2018, noviembre, 28). The Telegraph https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/11/28/chinese-scientist-says-gene-editing-trial-paused-international/
World Conferences on Research Integrity (2010). Declaración de Singapur sobre la integridad de la investigación. http://www.singaporestatement.org/.
Tozzi, M. (2008). Pensar por sí mismo. Editorial Popular.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura - UNESCO (2005). Declaración universal sobre Bioética y Derechos Humanos. http://portal.unesco.org/es/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Vaiano, B. (2019, octubre 6). Cientista chinês que editou DNA de gêmeas pode ter causado mutações indesejadas. https://super.abril.com.br/ciencia/cientista-chines-que-editou-dna-de-gemeas-pode-ter-causado-mutacoes-indesejadas/.
Vargas, G. (2006). Tratado de Epistemología Fenomenología de la ciencia, la tecnología y la investigación social. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional de Colombia.
Zúñiga, J.P. (2020). Comportamiento ético en la publicación científica: malas conductas y acciones para evitarlas. Revista Educación, 44(1), 1-16. https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/educacion/article/view/35548
Descargas
Publicado
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
